What the register says
Number, status, companyRead against the register and the terms, this entry produced a licence number, the status of the entry and the registered company. What it did not produce was a figure in the verification clause, and each missing item costs a point rather than being filled in from somewhere else.
| Field | What was read |
|---|---|
| Licence number | OGL/2024/210/0198 |
| Regulator | Curaçao Gaming Authority |
| Status of the entry | Active |
| Registered company | Wild Tech N.V. |
| Read on | 2026-09-02 |
A field marked as not readable is a statement about this desk's sources on the day, not an allegation about the operator. Anyone can repeat the lookup; the number is right there.
The cashier
What a rupee has to turn into first12 coins are listed at deposit, 2 of them stablecoins, which means a thin trading day on the P2P desk still leaves a second way in.
No casino in this comparison takes rupees. The route from a Pakistani wallet is always the same shape: Easypaisa, JazzCash or a bank transfer buys a coin from another trader on a P2P desk, the coin goes to your own wallet, and from there to the cashier. The deposit page lays out all four rails with the number of hands each one passes through.
Verification
What the clause actually binds them toVerification at the first withdrawal; the terms name no amount.
Practically every licence in this trade obliges the operator to be able to establish where money came from, so a house that dropped verification entirely would be breaching its own permission. The useful question is never whether they can ask — it is how tightly they have bound themselves about when. The full scale is on the verification page.
The bonus, priced in turnover
Three figures or no resultAdvertised as 350% + 200 free spins across the package. A headline percentage is not a price; the price is how much has to be staked before anything can leave, and that needs three published numbers — the percentage, the factor and the base it runs on.
- 01Deposit — PKR 5,000this page's worked example, not a suggested stake
- 02Bonus at 350% — PKR 17,500credit that lands in the account
- 03Base: the bonus alone — PKR 17,500the cheaper base — the deposit itself stays out of it
- 04Factor 40× — PKR 700,000turnover required before anything can leave
On a PKR 5,000 deposit this bonus costs PKR 700,000 of turnover to clear. Halve the deposit and the figure halves with it. What it does not include is the maximum stake allowed while wagering, the game weighting or the clock — and those are what a bonus usually fails on rather than the factor. They are on the bonus page.
The case both ways
Same entry, read twice| In its favour | Against it |
|---|---|
| Curaçao entry complete, with status and company | No amount in the verification clause |
| Cashier wide enough to take whatever a trade produces | No clause number given in the terms |
| Live tables for players arriving from a fiat casino | — |
Both columns come from the same reading. Nothing in the left column is a compliment and nothing in the right is an accusation: they are the two halves of what one afternoon of public-record work produced.
What is not known about this operator
Stated rather than papered over- How fast it pays. Never measured here, so never printed here.
- Whether it accepts players from Pakistan. That sits in its own terms and can change at any time, so it is not recorded as a property of this entry.
- What the games are like. Nobody here has played them with their own money.
Its neighbours in the table
The two entries you are comparing it withDirectly above it sits CryptoGames (Record 4/5, Reach 5/5). Directly below it sits Rainbet (Record 4/5, Reach 5/5). The order runs by Reach first and Record second, so a neighbour usually differs in one of the two and not in both — which is exactly the comparison worth making. The full table shows where every row falls, and the scoring page says what each point is for.